Australia could lead the world with the introduction of a scheme to make it easier for businesses and philanthropists to invest in nature repair programs.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
But a peak conservation body said the government should be focused on strengthening Australia's existing environmental laws rather than creating a new nature repair market.
Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek introduced her proposal for a repair market to federal parliament this week.
It would allow landowners to be paid by a third party for protecting and restoring nature on their land.
Possible projects would include removing drainage ditches to restore natural marsh habitats, support for Indigenous rangers to remove feral animals as well as seagrass meadow restoration.
Read also:
The Clean Energy Regulator would have monitoring and enforcement powers to make sure any funded projects were following restoration rules and regulations.
But the Australian Conservation Foundation said the test for the repair market would be whether it delivered genuine benefits for nature.
The foundation's national biodiversity policy adviser Brendan Sydes said the priority should be protecting the habitats still left.
"A great deal of important wildlife habitat is on private land, so it makes sense for the government to help channel support for private land holders to preserve and protect biodiversity on their land," he said.
"Linking 'nature repair' so closely to the generation of offsets risks facilitating the destruction of more existing wildlife habitat."
Ms Plibersek said multiple reports had shown Australia's environment was in a bad way and getting worse.
She said the proposed market would not replace government efforts to repair the environment, but enhance them.
She said the market would help landowners earn extra income, allow companies to show their environmental credentials and help philanthropists achieve their social mission.
